California residents started the new year with a bevy of changes to state law governing estate planning. One notable change is to California’s No Contest Clause Statute.

A no contest clause includes language in an estate planning instrument that warns heirs from challenging any provisions in the will at the risk of being disinherited in the process.

No contest clauses were originally seen as a way to avoid costly litigation and the public airing of dirty family laundry, and were fully enforced in California courts.

However, the California Law Revision Commission, while scrutinizing the statute in 2008, determined that the intent and the reality were far divorced from one another. Today, the Commission finds that no-contest clauses are too often being used by greedy and dishonest heirs as a tool to blackmail other family members into settling their disputes out of court. And heirs who had legitimate concerns that the instrument was executed fraudulently, under duress, or while the testator was mentally incapacitated were forced to seek judicial review under safe harbor hearings that would protect them from being disinherited.

As of January 1, 2010, California courts are giving no contest clauses included in wills and revocable trusts greater scrutiny. This means that no contest clauses included in wills or revocable trusts which became irrevocable on or after January 1, 2001 will remain enforceable, but heirs hoping to make a good faith challenge to the instrument will not be immediately disinherited upon challenge. Good faith probable cause challenges may be based on allegations including, but not limited to forgery, incapacity, duress, fraud, undue influence, or revocation.

If you have any questions about your estate planning documents or the effects of your no contest clause, contact your estate planning lawyer.

James D. Perry

There are a lot of things to look forward to in 2010, but those of us in estate planning and probate law were hoping for one last act of 2009 – Congressional action on the Death Tax.

The Death Tax officially died at midnight, December 31, 2009 meaning that any taxpayer dying in 2010 will not have to pay taxes on his or her estate. It will resurrect itself on January 1, 2011 at Clinton-era levels exempting only the first $1 million with a 55 percent tax rate.

Despite the appealing zero percent tax rate against estates, the hidden danger lies in recent changes to the capital gains tax laws. Heirs face heavy capital gains taxes on the sales of any inherited assets, which may potentially be more costly overall than the death tax.

President Barack Obama and members of Congress have indicated that they want to freeze the levy at 2009 levels ($3.5 million exemption, 45 percent tax) instead of letting it expire.

The House voted in December to put this plan into law. The Senate, though, declined to act until a more permanent solution was found.

It’s expected now that the Senate will take action (when, we’re not sure) and apply any new tax law retroactively. That move may face legal challenges and it still doesn’t help those looking to put into place a responsible estate plan.

Without government action, it is difficult for estate planning lawyers to properly advise clients.

Until this is resolved, all eyes are on The Hill.

James D. Perry