When an advance directive isn’t enough
Tuesday, March 16th, 2010A living will – called an advance directive for health care here in California – is an important part of your estate-planning arsenal. In the event of an accident or life-threatening incapacitation, an advance directive dictates your medical care and treatment preferences. This is especially helpful to family members and care providers because where there is uncertainty and disagreement, the court may have to step in.
An advance directive for heath care can fail its essential purpose, though, if it is ambiguous about treatment options and does not provide enough detailed guidance.
A recent MSNBC article highlighted this problem in the story of Bunny Olenick, an 87-year-old from Boston who became incapacitated by a severe stroke. She had a living will and a medical power of attorney, but her sons were left with questions about assisted breathing devices and feeding tubes and the quality of life she would sustain because of them.
She had stated that she didn’t want to be intubated or hooked up to a respirator, but did that preclude temporary nasogastric tubes for nutrition or a short-term oxygen mask?
Bunny’s sons were able to take advantage of palliative care counseling, which helped them navigate her legal documents and the preferences she had shared with them prior to her stroke.
However, had the sons gotten into a disagreement about Bunny’s wishes, they might have ended up petitioning a judge to appoint a medical proxy. The legal process is costly and ultimately may prolong an incapacitated individual’s life or suffering where he or she would not want it.
No one really likes to ponder their own death, but appropriate advanced planning can save you and your family pain and confusion in a time better spent saying goodbye.
James D. Perry

